Two disciplines. One adversary problem.
Spica was structured around a single conviction: threat intelligence and data architecture are the same problem viewed from different angles. We built the firm to match that reality.
Why we exist
Most organizations carry two separate conversations—one about security posture, one about data strategy. The adversary sees neither boundary. Spica was founded to close that structural gap.
We work with organizations where a breach is not a recoverable event: government agencies operating critical infrastructure, banks managing systemic exposure, and network operators whose downtime is measured in national consequence.
We model the attack before we recommend the architecture.
Engagement begins with threat modelling from the attacker's vantage: active intrusion paths, data exfiltration scenarios, legacy exposure vectors. Defensive architecture follows from that evidence.
Compliance documentation is produced last—derived from the architecture, not the other way around. Ransomware does not follow a checklist; neither does our methodology.
Brief us on your exposure.
Senior decision-makers engage directly. No sales funnel, no discovery theater—just a structured conversation about where your architecture is genuinely exposed.